ISU Reacts to Proposal to Change Drinking Age

Tools

ISU Reacts to Proposal to Change Drinking Age

University of Washington football player, Ryan Bush, drinks chocolate milk after practice as part of the teams' cool down routine at Husky Stadium in Seattle.

By Gina Ford

What if the legal drinking age was lowered to 18?

A group of college presidents from around the country is pushing for that...'what if?' as a way to curb binge drinking.

Amythest Initiative, a group of college heads from around the nation, has created a plan to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18.
Their proposal claims that since Congress passed the minimum drinking age in the '80s, binge–drinking and fake IDs have taken off.
Some I–S–U students agree.

"It makes so much more sense, because people aren't going to be as rowdy if they can drink like starting when they're 18," said ISU student Matt Powles, 18.

Matt Powles says he was arrested two years ago after a friend was stopped for drunk driving and evading police, something Powles says would not have happened if he were legally allowed to drink.

"We would have had a cab pick us up or we would have just had our parents pick us up. But this was my junior year in high school, so we were still trying to hide it from our parents," said Powles.

Other ISU students shared the same sentiments, but the mayor of Normal says it was bad behavior that banned drinking for minors in the first place.

"It was removed because there were more traffic fatalities, more accidents as a result," said Normal Mayor Chris Koos.

Although there were definitely students in favor of lowering the drinking age, surprisingly the majority of students I spoke with said they were against it.

"If you lower it, people might not be responsible enough yet mentally to handle something like that.
So I think it would actually cause a problem if they do that," said ISU student Cara Suggs, 20.

"Drinking is probably considered a privilege just like driving is a privilege.
You shouldn't be able to do something that you know you're not going to be old enough to do yet," said Kevin Orabutt, 21.

Other students believe there would be more fights and a need for increased campus police.
So for now, Amythest Initiative's vision isn't shared by many students and officials on the ISU campus.

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 12:39 PM muNchkin wrote ...

i hightly agree with lowering the age of drinking; 18 years olds have the option of going to war,risking their lives for a whole counrty, yet they can have a something as simple as a beer. Yes their young. yes they just wanna have fun as much as they can.The more you say they cant drink the more they want to do it.

Friday, Aug 29 at 2:16 AM Josh wrote ...

I am currently living in Holland where the legal drinking age is 16. There are much much less issues and problems with kids drinking here; it's quite remarkable. The culture doesn't make it taboo. The parents have the opportunity to teach their kids what responsible drinking is. It's a cultural problem in America. We are so uptight - and not realistic. Let the parents teach their kids.

Monday, Aug 25 at 12:37 AM MJ wrote ...

This is sort of like raising the speed limit because people speed. It's stupid. How can supposedly intelligent people consider this any type of positive solution. They are out to lunch.

Thursday, Aug 21 at 7:07 PM Ronnie D wrote ...

It makes perfect sense you can die for your country in iraq but you cant have a beer. . . You can buy a house and get loans but cant have a shot of vodka . . . If your able to drink at 18 most kids would still be living at home and responible parents would be able to have a little control over the situation when as when your 21 you know how much the world sucks and want to drink away your problems.

Thursday, Aug 21 at 11:08 AM Dave wrote ...

I go to a private school in Naperville, pay 100 percent of my tuition on my own, work a full work week from 8-4, just to pay for that education... i should be able to have a drink whenever I want

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 10:18 PM KA wrote ...

Explain encouragement? Politics says this, we can send our kids to war as something encouraging for them to do.Constructive is by killing anyone that doesnt like the US ways. We can give our kids cancer by selling them tobacco but yet they cant drink? Explain encourage and constuctive when politics are involved, then explain why they shouldn't be able to drink again?

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 6:49 PM EJ wrote ...

i think it is a great idea, i feel it will help kids relieve themselves from stress and plus once they have the freedom to drink they wont use it as much as one would think because teens like to break rules, they dont do it to only get wasted. this way they wont get into trouble as easy. i know what im saying i have a 16, 18, 19 year old.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 3:21 PM sarah wrote ...

if the drinking age was lowered there would be WAY less hassle of teens finding more dangerous ways of getting alcohols. its more of a problem of teens finding a way to get alcohol.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 1:56 PM Robin wrote ...

While lowering the drinking age doesn't equate to teenagers drinking in moderation, it does equate to the opportunity for their parents to introduce alchohol in a healthy responsible environment.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 11:37 AM jc wrote ...

If you can go to war at 18 you should be able to have a beer.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 10:08 AM jballent wrote ...

these 'kids' are old enough to go to war and die for their country, but not old enough- at least according to you- to have a beer.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 8:31 AM Benedict Arnold wrote ...

Hey when all else fails....surrender...

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 8:15 AM B wrote ...

The real problem here is controlling the purchase of alcohol for minors not the legal age of drinking. We need to focus on policing this clear problem and maybe having harsher punishment. Reducing the drinking age will certainly cause more harm. Keep in mind also that the age at 18 would allow seniors in high school to purchase alcohol and a lot more kids would have access to a senior in their same school than they would with someone who graduated 3 years ago.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 7:18 AM Kelli wrote ...

The fact that Matt Powles says he was arrested two years ago after a friend was stopped for drunk driving and evading police would not have happened if he were legally allowed to drink only proves that younger adults (late teens) are not mature enough to drink responsibly. Legality of a substance does not equate to using that substance in moderation.

Wednesday, Aug 20 at 7:14 AM Bleep wrote ...

Great idea ... make it easier for kids to drink. What are they thinking? They need to encourage these KIDS to find something more constructive to do with themselves -- NOT encourage drinking. Shame on them.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

WEEK News 25 and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Stock Quotes

What's On TonightFull Schedule

7:00
Christmas in Rockefeller
8:00
Life
9:00
Law & Order
Local Business Dir

Poll

How do you feel about Nativity Scenes or Other Religious Symbols Being Displayed on Government Property?

  • It should be allowed as part of a Holiday tradition
  • It shouldn't be allowed because of a separation between Church and State
  • it doesn't really bother me one way or the other